Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tomas Lipovsek Puches vs David Fleming Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Puches vs Fleming analysis and find out who is favored!
Tomas Lipovsek Puches vs David Fleming Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Puches 3 - 0 Fleming
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Puches has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Fleming has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Puches, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Fleming has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Puches has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fleming has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Puches has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 8), with Fleming winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Puches has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 331/ 257), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Fleming has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 126/ 127), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Puches has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 5), where as Fleming has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Puches winning 3 times and Fleming being victorious 0 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Puches winning 6 and Fleming winning 0. The last match between Puches and Fleming was at the Chile F9, 07-12-2015, Second, Clay with Tomas Lipovsek Puches getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:47:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Puches and Fleming have played a deciding set 0 times, with Puches winning 0 times and Fleming 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Puches winning 0, and Fleming 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Puches has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.25 while Fleming has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Puches has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fleming has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Puches has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fleming has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
886
Rank
250
High
31
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
0
Hard0
3
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
55% (360-291)
Career Total W/L
49% (130-133)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$2,835
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Tomas Lipovsek Puches vs David Fleming For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Puches VS Fleming
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Tomas Lipovsek Puches | David Fleming |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 0 |
| Games Won | 33 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 9 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:47:20 | 0:47:20 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (68/103) | 66% (59/90) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (48/68) | 47% (28/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (16/35) | 26% (8/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (9/15) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (54/90) | 38% (39/103) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
Player
David Fleming
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
16 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| 6-3 3-1 ret. |
Stats
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
Player
David Fleming
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
30 of
41)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tomas Lipovsek Puches | David Fleming |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tomas Lipovsek Puches Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
76%
(
51 of
67)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Parizzia
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Tepmahc
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
73%
(
40 of
55)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Vincent
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
86)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luka Mikrut
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fajing Sun
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
46%
(
18 of
39)
1st Serve %
45%
(
34 of
75)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
11
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
41)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Remy Bertola
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Vrbensky
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Leonardo Aboian
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
71%
(
30 of
42)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pedro Sakamoto
Player
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
David Fleming Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Alejandro Hidalgo
Player
David Fleming
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Acevedo
Player
David Fleming
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Carlos Saez
Player
David Fleming
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
37 of
65)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Fleming
Player
Tomas Gerini
62%
(
61 of
98)
1st Serve %
84%
(
89 of
106)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
4
51%
(
31 of
61)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
44 of
89)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
52%
(
51 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
106)
101
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 1-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
David Fleming
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
9
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
42 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
4-6 6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Lenny Hampel
Player
David Fleming
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Puches Vs Fleming Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Puches are available here and Fleming photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
